Plus working in the SEO industry for almost 5 years now. To some I am simply a young pup, but I need to say the results we get from your SEO promotions speak for themselves.
As you work in this field of SEO you usually tend to network with other SEO professionals and stay tuned with the latest SEO waves or changes from Google. You also connect to other SEO experts in the community forums and blogs.
I want to express my panic about the amount of complexity added to the main topic of SEO. About 80% info on SEO out there exists too deep and intricate, with an awful whole lot of opinions.
Similar to technology or methodology, people are looking for user friendliness. They want a thing that works, creates an effect or makes a difference. This same strategy is applicable to SEO.
Using a technology requires sticking with the basics of that technology. If you sort through the 1000s of available “sources” you usually can locate the real source, which is the information and method one should use when exercising how to go about it. This can be a correct way to learn and apply whatever.
I find it amazing how some SEO experts throw their opinions away on their high-powered sites, only to confuse another thousand SEO experts.
That is laughable to watch, and it goes like this:
SEO Expert May well, needs to get “green carrots” on page one particular of Google for a client.
He’s working on it for months, storing, social networks, links and many others.
After 2-3 months this individual uses a step back and looks at his invitee and keyword stats. Not really much change, he seriously isn’t getting the results great client is starting to wonder.
Suddenly he understands that the cool video on YouTube may boost things up and get’s this produced an online.
The next week “green carrots” is on page 1! It can great, it worked and the customer is all happy.
Following staking it slowly laid back and looking at his results, he suddenly understands that he never optimized the content of his page with enough keywords. Oops. He only stated “green carrots” once and still got a site 1 result. This attacks him as strange and it seems to disobey everything he learned about page optimisation in SEO.
What goes on next is interesting. The SEO expert determines this is valuable information and experience. He has just seen the pursuing new search rule in play, which should be distributed to anyone doing SEO:
“Google is no longer giving any value to keyword density. This kind of plays no part in SEO. ”
He creates a nice 1000 expression article about it and due to his experience, is extremely certain of his findings. He even makes a jab at Google about no referencing it to anyone. Right now he has kudos for locating this out before other people.
This is extremely frustrating for everyone who wants to learn the subject of SEO or even old school SEO professionals. And it is for that reason short-sightedness that the internet is filled with millions of pages about SEO which would much better positioned in the trash.
Now no longer get me wrong, My spouse and i is not talking about the countless very useful articles, digests and tutorials away there which can greatly assist an SEO expert to get his job done faster. I have always been talking about those people who create their own interpretations of precisely what is an extremely correct and logical technology – SEO.
Adding confusion to the subject Playa Del Carmen SEO
Excellent real example of this. A week ago I read and article from a “leading SEO source”, Seomoz. In their article The Basics of Search Engine Friendly Style and Development, they point out loud and bold that:
“Keyword density is, without question, Not really a part of modern web website positioning methods for the simple reason that it provides considerably worse results than many other, heightened methods of keyword analysis. inches
Quite a statement! Who’s your source? They referenced Doctor Edel Garcia’s seminal work with the topic – The Keyword Density of Non-Sense. Should you go through this source’s article, D
r. Edel Garcia attempts to break down the mathematical formula of keyword density increasing search results and in the ends supposedly shows it could not be true.